This is because all versions of Lightroom are now only available via a Creative Cloud subscription, so there is no need to differentiate the CC version from the perpetual license version. Before getting into the new features that have been added, it is important to note that Adobe has dropped the “CC” from the names of Lightroom Classic CC and Lightroom CC.
Extending this to 2GB would cost an arm and a leg.Today, Adobe has released an update for the Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw family of applications. This is the max that Apple offer.ġ TB of SSD storage which considering I store all my images on EHD's should suffice. Haven't quite figured out what that means at this time with further web searches needed lol.ġ6GB 2666MHz DDR4 memory although could push finances to 32GB is absolutely necessary although not really desirable at this timeĪMD Radeon Pro 5500M with 8GB of GDDR6 memory. The switching between LR and PS will be limited because I'm not into editing to the tenth degree so to say and from past experience jumping between the two lies between 1-2 photos out of every 10.Ģ.3 GHz 8-core 9th generation Intel Core i9 Processor with Turbo Boost up to 4.8GHy. Which brings me to the reason for this post and that is to seek users advice on whether a MacBook Pro with the following specs would be up to the job of running Lightroom Classic, Photoshop and Final Cut Pro X although not all at the same time of course. So my intention come the new year is to splash out some hard earned pocket money and invest in a Mac laptop along with a subscription to Lightroom Classic. the Dell XPS series the internet is full of user complaints in one form or another and whilst I accept that this is par for any web/forum site Macs appear to come in for far less criticism. Whilst I have looked at several Windows replacement laptops i.e. Hi, My 6-year old Windows laptop is slowly giving up the ghost although I did manage to upgrade (free) from Windows 7 to Windows 10 a while back which runs Lightroom v5.7 as smooth as silk.
0 kommentar(er)
